In Virginia elections, “none of the above” should be a ballot choice

notaAs we head into local and state elections this year, it might be a good time to have an alternative that doesn’t currently exist on Virginia ballots.

That alternative: “None of the above.”

This is a year when voters need the chance to send a message to all political sides of the equation that no candidate whose name appears on the voting screen deserves a vote for election or re-election.

When I head over to Floyd County Rescue Squad Station 1 on that Tuesday morning in November, I’m not sure if I will see a single name on the ballot worthy of a vote in the governor’s race.  It means holding your nose and casting a vote because no voting is not a real option in a democracy.

Of course, having “none of the above” on the ballot only works if the law allows a a majority of “none of the above” to not allow election or re-election of anyone on the ballot. If “none of above,” for example, got more votes than an unopposed person on the ballot, then no one is elected and — ideally — a new election would have to be held with new candidates.

Unfortunately, “None of the Above” is not offered on the Virginia ballot or in in 48 other states of the nation.  Only Nevada has such an option.  That state offers “none of these candidates” as a vote option but even if that option gets the most votes, the winner is the actual candidate who gets the most votes.

In 1976, “none of these candidates” received 16,097 votes — far more than any candidate — in a Republican primary for Nevada’s at-large Congressional seat.  The victory, however, went to Walden Earhart, who got 9,831 votes.  Earhart then lost to the Democratic candidate Jim Santini.

However, “none of these candidates” can be a “spoiler” in the race.  In 1998, Harry Reid held on to his Senate season by beating Republican challenger John Ensign by just 428 votes.  “None of these candidates” received 8,125 votes in that election.

“None of these candidates” on the ballot scared Republicans so much that they filed a lawsuit in federal court in 2012 to try and have the ballot option declared unconstitutional.  The Republican National Committee was afraid the ballot option would cost Presidential candidate Mitt Romney a chance to win that state.  The case went back and forth in lower courts before a federal appeals court tossed the case out.  Incumbent President Barack Obama beat Romney by more than 60,000 votes.  “None of these candidates” received 5,570 votes.

In Virginia this year, “none of the above” is not an option.  It never is. In the governor’s race the choice is between a current Republican attorney general with a questionable record on ethics, honesty and the law, a Democratic businessman who once rain the party’s national committee but has never held a public elected office and a libertarian candidate with no real record on anything of value.

Two incumbent Floyd County supervisors are up for re-election — Board Supervisor Case Clinger (Courthouse district) and Indian Valley Supervisor Fred Gerald.  Neither are opposed even though a number of citizens have expressed concern and disgust over recent actions of the board that runs the county.

In 1964, Barry Goldwater ran unsuccessfully for the Presidency with the campaign slogan: “A Choice, Not an Echo.”

In Virginia this year, the overall campaign theme is just the opposite:  “An echo, not a choice.”

In other words:  None of the above.

6 thoughts on “In Virginia elections, “none of the above” should be a ballot choice”

  1. Which two incumbent supervisors are up for re-election? Is it too late for anyone to oppose them? Not that I am volunteering – I don’t have the free time to participate.

    • Board chairman Case Clinger (Courthouse district) and Fred Gerald of Indian Valley District are running. Both are unopposed and the filing deadlines have passed. Ballots are set.

  2. Libertarian Robert Sarvis will be on the ballot for governor. Despite what you may think of the Libertarian Party, he is known as an honest man and is the best choice of the three in my opinion.

  3. Thanks for the info on Robert Sarvis. I had never heard of him, but I just looked him up on wikipedia. He has my vote and I will be telling others about him.

Comments are closed.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter